Markus Gugatschka 1

1 ENT University Hospital Graz, Phoniatrics, Graz

Introduction: Considerable forces are exerted on oropharyngeal tissues during microlaryngoscopic procedures. In most cases fulcrum-based laryngoscopy is performed, with laryngoscopes of different sizes and kinds. Aim of our study was to describe forces occurring during microlaryngoscopy as well as parameters influencing easiness of exposure.

Methods: 100 consecutive patients scheduled for microlaryngoscopy underwent study procedures. While performing microlaryngoscopy under general anaesthesia by using a microlaryngoscopy device after Kleinsasser, force measurements were obtained with a tension spring balance attached to the laryngoscope holder. By using the law of the lever we calculated forces on upper teeth and base of the tongue. Measurements were taken in neutral position, during extension of the cervical spine, as well as under moderate and maximum flexion.

Results: Mean force obtained by measurement with the spring balance in our study cohort was 4.4 kg (43.2 N). Whereas the force exerted on the teeth/toothless upper jaw was 4.4 fold the aforementioned, the force exerted to the tongue was the sum of both forces. Elevation of the patient’s head thus flexing the cervical spine reduced the occurring forces significantly. Maximum elevation allowed a full exposure of the anterior commissure in all cases, whereas exposure of the anterior commissure was not possible even with maximum external counterpressure in almost 40% of cases with maximum extended cervical spine.

Conclusion: The forces exerted to the oropharyngeal tissues during microlaryngoscopic interventions are noteworthy. Taking into consideration the magnitude of occurring forces, one can imagine very easily that injuries may appear. Elevation of the patient’s head allows a better exposure during microlaryngoscopy. This manoeuvre reduces the forces on the tissues significantly, and minimises the risk of peri- and postoperative complications.

Jan Vanderwegen 1 , Nora van Ardenne 1 , Gwen Van Nuffelen 1 , Marc De Bodt 1 , Paul Van de Heyning 1

1 UZ Antwerpen, NKO, Edegem

Question : Unilateral vocal fold paralysis (ULVFP) can result in incomplete glottal closure. This  compromises the vocal efficiency and increases the risk of aspiration.  Medialization thyroplasty  reduces the glottal gap  with the intention to improve vocal function. Several types of material have been implanted for vocal fold medialization. Both silicone and titanium implants have been described to be efficient in improvement of the phonatory outcome. However the functional vocal results of the two implant materials have not yet been compared.Our aim was to assess the phonatory outcome after medialization thyroplasty using silicone and titanium implants and to compare the results of the two implanted materials.

Methods: From May 2005 until February 2009 24 patients underwent medialization thyroplasty, mainly performed under local anaesthesia with intravenous sedation. All patients underwent vocal assessment prior to and after surgical intervention.  Both patient self perceptual evaluation using the Voice Handicap Index (VHI), maximum phonation time (MPT) and the Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI) were applied. Results: 17 men and 7 women were operated. 15 left sided and 9 right sided thyroplasties were performed. Postoperative problems included wound infection in the titanium group and formation of granulation tissue with extrusion of the implant in the silicone group, both occurring 1 time. Postoperative analysis showed significant improvement for the VHI, MPT and DSI (p ≤ 0.0008). Subgroup analysis proved a statistically significant advantage for  the titanium implant for VHI (p= 0.028) and MPT (p=0.028), but not for the DSI (p= 0.82).

Conclusions: Both silicone and titanium medialization implants showed improvement of Voice Handicap Index, maximum phonation time and Dysphonia Severity Index postoperatively, the results of the titanium implant being even more promising. However the postoperative voice parameters did not reach normal limits.

Manal El-Banna 1 , Hesham Abdelfattah 1

1 Faculty of Medicine, otorhinolaryngology, Alexandria

Introduction: Various surgical techniques have been adopted for management of early glottic cancer with the aim of eradicating the malignant chances and preserving the voice character. Researchers commonly direct their studies to indicate the effectiveness of one technique over the other, but some were only concentrating on documenting acoustic combined with aerodynamic changes in indicating the advantage of these techniques. The aim of the study is to determine the voice quality for patient after various surgical interventions for treatment of early cancer larynx. Subjects: The study group consists of 20 patients (7 had unilateral cordectomy and 5 had bilateral cordectomy and 8 had hemilaryngectomy) subjected to surgical intervention for management of early glottic cancer. These will be grouped according to type of surgical procedures. Thirteen age matched control group was randomly selected for obtaining normal computer voice function parameters. Methodology: The two groups were subjected protocol of voice evaluation carried out at the Unit of Phoniatrics: with specific reference to acoustic and aerodynamic voice evaluation.Acoustic Analysis using Multi Dimensional Voice Program (MDVP) of Kay Elemetrics Cooperation. Phonatory aerodynamic measurements were done using Voice Function Analyzer Aerophone II software Model 6800 (Kay Elemetric 2001) and the associated software. Conclusion: Acoustic analysis revealed that all acoustic voice parameters were significantly different from control except tremor measures, voice turbulence index, soft phonation index. All Aerodynamic measures were not significantly different except for phonatory efficiency and resistance and maximum phonation time. No significant difference of voice quality measured acoustically between patients subject to unilateral cordectomy and hemilaryngectomy was found except in measures of NSH,and DSH.

 

 

Alfonso Borragan 1 , Luis Buelta 2 , Andrea Ricci Maccarini 3 , Giovanni de Rossi 4

1 Centro de Foniatría y Logopedia, , Santander

2 Cantabria University, Faculty of Medicine, Santander

3 Ospedale “M. Bufalini”, ORL, Cesena

4 Ospedale San Bonifacio di Soave, ORL, Verona